- Sept 21, 2016 09H:11 GMT/UTC/ZULU TIME
- Middle East
EPA
The US has said it holds Russia responsible for a deadly attack on an aid convoy near the Syrian city of Aleppo on Monday.
The White House has called it an "enormous humanitarian tragedy".
Meanwhile, US officials have told us at the BBC that two Russian war planes were responsible for the attack.
Russia strongly denies involvement of its own or Syrian planes, and says the incident was caused by fire on the ground and not by an air strike.
"There are no craters and the exterior of the vehicles do not have the kind of damage consistent with blasts caused by bombs dropped from the air," a statement from the defence ministry said.
And the country's foreign ministry spokeswoman said the US government had "no facts" to support its claim, adding: "We have nothing to do with this situation."
- Children suffer horrors of Syria's war
- US unease over joint air action with Russia
- How will the new truce work?
- What's left after five years of war?
Separately, an airstrike hit a medical centre near Aleppo on Tuesday night local time, killing four medics working for the Union of Medical Care and Relief Organizations (UOSSM), the group said.
The attack on the town of Khan Touman also killed at least nine rebel fighters and was carried out by either Syrian or Russian warplanes, UK-based monitoring group the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights said.
One nurse remains in a critical condition and the medical centre was completely destroyed, UOSSM said in a statement (in French), adding that more victims are feared buried under the rubble.
Speaking earlier about Monday's attack on the aid convoy, US officials, speaking on condition of anonymity, said two Russian SU-24 attack aircraft were in the sky above the convoy at the precise moment it was hit in Urum al-Kubra.
The strike, they added, was too sophisticated to have been carried out by the Syrian army.
RUSSIA'S DEFENCE MINISTRY/REUTERS
White House spokesman Ben Rhodes later said: "There only could have been two entities responsible, either the Syrian regime or the Russian government.
"In any event, we hold the Russian government responsible for airstrikes in this space."
The UN had earlier said it was "not in a position to determine whether these were in fact air strikes".
'Deal not dead'
Eighteen of 31 lorries were destroyed and about 20 civilians were killed including a senior official of the Syrian Arab Red Crescent.
The attack prompted the UN to suspend all aid convoys in Syria.
Meanwhile, diplomats in New York were trying to save a week-old truce agreement brokered by the US and Russia which was declared over by Syrian military hours before the incident.
US Secretary of State John Kerry, speaking alongside his Russian counterpart Sergei Lavrov, insisted the cessation of hostilities deal was "not dead", following talks with delegates of the Syria Support Group.
They are to meet again on Friday. And the UN Security Council is due to hold a high-level meeting on Syria on Wednesday.
'Blood on their hands'
Earlier, Ban Ki-moon, the UN chief, launched a stinging attack on Syria's government, saying it has killed the most civilians in the five-year civil war.
Using unusually blunt language in his final address to the UN General Assembly, Mr Ban also said those who supported the opposing sides in the conflict had "blood on their hands".
GETTY IMAGES
"Many groups have killed many innocents, but none more so than the government of Syria which continues to barrel bomb neighbourhoods and systematically torture thousands of detainees."
He said other countries "that keep feeding the war machine also have blood on their hands".
Mr Ban called the attack on the aid convoy "sickening, savage and apparently deliberate" and called for those responsible to be held to account.
Syria responded by accusing Mr Ban of flouting the UN charter.
"The words of Ban Ki-moon today on Syria are far removed from the provisions of the UN charter, which need to be respected by (the person) who occupies the role of secretary general," a foreign ministry statement said.
It said the UN had "failed in its role" to find solutions to international conflicts.
GETTY IMAGES
Aid deliveries to besieged areas had been a key part of the cessation of hostilities.
The president of the International Committee of the Red Cross, Peter Maurer, denounced the attack as a "flagrant violation of international humanitarian law" and said it could amount to a war crime.
The Syrian military and rebels have accused each other of widespread violations of the ceasefire deal.
- US unease over joint air action with Russia
- Aleppo: Syria's key battleground
- How will the new Syria truce work?
- What's left of Syria after five years of war?
- Behind the scenes at the Syria talks
- Syria's refugee exodus
- What has happened to al-Qaeda?
- Syria peace talks and polls signal Assad's growing confidence
- Syria: The view from Golan Heights
- Why is there a war in Syria?
- What's a 'cessation of hostilities'?
- Syria: A different country after five years of war
- How do Syrian children explain the war?
- Is Syria's 'truce' worth the paper it's printed on?
- Syria war: Tide turns Assad's way
- How Putin is succeeding in Syria
- Syria conflict at 'hinge moment'
- Civilians under siege in Syria
- Syria crisis: Where key countries stand
- Islamic State crisis in seven charts
- Syria's war: Special report
No comments:
Post a Comment