Biodun Iginla, BBC News

Biodun Iginla, BBC News
Showing posts with label Chuck Schumer. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Chuck Schumer. Show all posts

Sunday, March 22, 2020

ANALYSIS AND BREAKING: US lines up multi-trillion dollar coronavirus aid packages


ADVERTISING
Washington 
Congress and the US government were working furiously on Sunday to provide trillions of dollars in rescue money aimed at cushioning both businesses and ordinary Americans from the devastating impact of the coronavirus pandemic.
Lawmakers on Capitol Hill were nearing a deal to inject roughly $1.6 trillion into businesses and the pockets of millions of workers laid off as the Covid-19 virus continues to spread. A separate package would provide a stunning $4 trillion in liquidity to juice up the economy.
A procedural vote in the Senate on the smaller package was set for 3:00pm (1900 GMT) Sunday.
"We look forward to wrapping it up today," Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin told "Fox News Sunday."
Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell said late Saturday that the deal was "very close." His Democratic counterpart, Chuck Schumer, said that "to my delight and surprise there has been a great deal of bipartisan cooperation thus far."
Mnuchin, who for days has been locked in intensive negotiations over virus-related rescue measures, also detailed a separate massive relief package being worked on to support hard-hit businesses.
Under one part of that plan a "significant package working with the Federal Reserve will have up to $4 trillion of liquidity that we can use to support the economy," Mnuchin told "Fox News Sunday."
Together, the urgent measures represented one of the most dramatic governmental rescue efforts outside time of war, with millions of people thrown out of work, thousands of businesses shuttered or badly suffering, travel severely curtailed and no certainty as to when things might improve.
They also came as the death toll from the pandemic continued to rise -- especially in hotspots like New York City -- and as local and state officials across the country warned of dire consequences in the absence of more aggressive federal action.
- 'Worse is yet to come' -
"The worse is yet to come," New York Mayor Bill De Blasio said on CNN, predicting hospitals in the city would face serious shortages of protective equipment within days unless drastic action is taken.
"We expect April will be a lot worse than March and I fear May could be worse than April," he said.
Illinois Governor J.B. Pritzker said he had seen some improvement in the flow of medical supplies, but he still had sharply critical words for the federal government's approach.
"It is better," he said, but hospitals were still receiving "just a fraction" of what they had requested.
Pritzker blamed in part the administration's decision to leave the supply chain up to private companies and not intervene to take control -- as US President Donald Trump has the authority to do under the federal Defense Production Act.
"Yes, we're competing against each other" for supplies, the governor said, referring to the different states.
"You know, it's a Wild West, I would say, out there."
New York congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, an outspoken liberal, was also sharply critical of the federal response.
"The fact that the president has not really invoked the Defense Production Act for the purpose of emergency manufacture is going to cost lives," she told CNN.
"We cannot wait until people start really dying in large numbers to start production," she said.
Mnuchin said the relief package being voted on Sunday had three parts: it would give small businesses enough cash to pay laid-off workers for two weeks; it would provide direct cash payments to Americans (about $3,000 for a family of four, he said); and it would enhance unemployment insurance for those laid off.
It would also provide funds to support hard-pressed hospitals and medical professionals.

Sunday, November 24, 2019

ANALYSIS: US Navy Secretary Richard Spencer fired over Seal case


Secretary of the Navy Richard Spencer addresses the crew of the U.S. Navy aircraft carrier USS Gerald R Ford on October 27, 2019Image copyrightREUTERS
Image captionNavy Secretary Richard Spencer said he and Trump did not have the same view of "discipline"
by Melissa Gruz and Biodun Iginla, BBC News Analysts, Washington
US Defence Secretary Mark Esper has fired Navy chief Richard Spencer over his handling of the case of a Navy Seal demoted for misconduct.
The case of Edward Gallagher, who was convicted for posing with a corpse, had sparked tensions between President Donald Trump and military officials.
The Navy officer had been due to face a disciplinary review where he could have been stripped of his Seals membership.
There have been differing accounts as to why Mr Spencer was asked to resign.
Mr Esper said he had lost confidence in the Navy secretary because his private conversations with the White House contradicted his public position.
However, Mr Trump said he was not happy with "cost overruns" and how Chief Petty Officer Gallagher's trial was run, and suggested this was why Mr Spencer was fired.
Meanwhile, in a strongly-worded letter, Mr Spencer said it was apparent that he and Mr Trump did not have the same view of "good order and discipline".

How did we get here?

Chief Gallagher was accused of stabbing an unarmed 17-year-old Islamic State group prisoner to death and randomly shooting civilians while serving in Iraq in 2017.
He was acquitted of those charges and convicted only of the lesser charge of posing with the IS prisoner's corpse.
For that he was demoted, but President Trump later reinstated his rank.
Chief Gallagher was formally notified by Navy leaders last week that he would face a disciplinary review which could result in his being stripped of his membership of the Seals.
Mr Trump tweeted his disapproval of this on Thursday, saying the Navy would "NOT be taking away Warfighter and Navy SEAL Eddie Gallagher's Trident Pin".
Mr Trump has drawn criticism from parts of the military after pardoning army officers convicted of war crimes.

Why was Spencer fired?

On Sunday, the defence department said Mr Esper had asked Mr Spencer to resign due to "his lack of candour".
Mr Spencer had made private proposals to the White House, which he did not share with Mr Esper, and had contradicted his public position, Pentagon spokesman Jonathan Hoffmann said in a statement.
According to the Washington Post, Mr Spencer had privately suggested to White House officials that if they did not interfere with proceedings against Chief Petty Officer Gallagher, he would ensure that the officer retired as a Navy Seal.
However, the New York Times quoted defence officials as saying that Mr Trump had been angered by reports that Mr Spencer had threatened to resign if the president intervened in the case.
Mr Trump tweeted on Sunday that he was not happy with how the Navy had handled Chief Gallagher's trial, and high costs in the Navy's contracting procedures.
"Therefore, Secretary of the Navy Richard Spencer's services have been terminated," he said, adding: "Eddie will retire peacefully with all of the honours that he has earned, including his Trident pin."
In his resignation letter to President Trump, Mr Spencer wrote: "The rule of law is what sets us apart from our adversaries. Good order and discipline is what has enabled our victory against foreign tyranny time and again."
"Unfortunately it has become apparent that in this respect, I no longer share the same understanding with the Commander in Chief who appointed me, in regards to the key principle of good order and discipline."
"I cannot in good conscience obey an order that I believe violates the sacred oath I took."
Senior Democratic Senator Chuck Schumer commended Richard Spencer for "standing up to President Trump when he was wrong, something too many in this administration and the Republican Party are scared to do".

What does this mean for Gallagher?

Edward GallagherImage copyrightREUTERS
Image captionNavy Seal Special Operations Chief Edward Gallagher was accused of war crimes in Iraq
Mr Esper has instructed that Chief Gallagher be allowed to retire as a Navy Seal, retaining his Trident pin which symbolises membership of the elite unit.
While Mr Esper had wanted the disciplinary process to "play itself out objectively", he had decided to let Chief Gallagher keep his pin "given the events of the last few days", defence spokesman Jonathan Hoffman said in a statement.
He had concluded that Chief Gallagher could not receive fair treatment in his case from the Navy, AP news reported.
"Secretary Esper will meet with Navy Under Secretary (now Acting Secretary) Thomas Modley and the Chief of Naval Operations Admiral Michael Gilday on Monday morning to discuss the way ahead," the statement said.
Chief Gallagher told the conservative Fox News channel on Sunday that he intends to retire next Saturday.

Related Topics

More on this story