Biodun Iginla, BBC News

Biodun Iginla, BBC News
Showing posts with label Dan Coats. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Dan Coats. Show all posts

Friday, September 7, 2018

Top Trump aides rush to disavow NYTimes 'resistance' article

September 7, 2018  13H:45  GMT/UTC/ZULU TIME
WASHINGTON - Top aides to Donald Trump scrambled on Thursday to deny authorship of an anonymous New York Times opinion column that slammed the U.S. president’s leadership style and described “a quiet resistance” to him within his own administration.
By early afternoon, eight senior officials had disavowed the piece, including Vice President Mike Pence, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and Defense Secretary James Mattis, while hammering the author for writing it and the Times for publishing it.
Trump seethed about the piece and presented it as one more jab from the ranks of disgruntled critics in denial about his presidential successes, even as Washington was consumed with speculation about who wrote it.
First Lady Melania Trump said in a statement on Twitter, “To the writer of the oped - you are not protecting this country, you are sabotaging it with your cowardly actions.”
The article, published on Wednesday, appeared just days after the publication of excerpts from a new book by famed Watergate reporter Bob Woodward that portrays Trump as prone to impulsive decision-making. The excerpts described senior aides as sometimes disregarding his instructions to limit what they saw as damaging behavior.
On Wednesday, visibly angry at a White House event, Trump called the Times article a “gutless editorial,” and in a later tweet he suggested it was treasonous.
The Times opinion section said the piece was written by a senior official in the administration and that it was taking the rare step of publishing an anonymous article because disclosing the author’s identity would jeopardize the person’s job.
SPONSORED
Senior aides, some of whom have also been denying episodes from Woodward’s book this week, lined up to disavow authorship of the piece, known as an op-ed for its place in the opinion section.
Pompeo said during a trip to India that he was not the author and condemned the Times for publishing it, while Pentagon spokeswoman Dana White said Mattis did not write the piece.
Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen spokesman Tyler Houlton said, “Secretary Nielsen is focused on leading the men and women of DHS and protecting the homeland - not writing anonymous and false opinion pieces for the New York Times.”
Nielsen, along with Pence and Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats were among the favorites on Thursday among gamblers trying their luck online at guessing the author.
FILE PHOTO: U.S. President Donald Trump (C) dellivers remarks after attending a swearing-in ceremony for Defense Secretary James Mattis (R) with Vice President Mike Pence at the Pentagon in Washington, U.S., January 27, 2017. REUTERS/Carlos Barria/File Photo
A spokesman for Pence said the vice president does not write anonymous opinion columns. “The @nytimes should be ashamed and so should the person who wrote the false, illogical, and gutless op-ed,” spokesman Jarrod Agen said on Twitter.
Coats said in a statement that speculation that he or his principal deputy wrote the piece was “patently false.”
The opinion piece, and Woodward’s book, which is published next week, follow many news articles during Trump’s 19-month presidency that have depicted turbulence at the White House under his leadership. The former reality TV star has had an unusually high level of staff turnover, and has sometimes been publicly critical of his top aides.
The critical spotlight on Trump’s leadership comes just two months before midterm elections in which his fellow Republicans are seeking to maintain control of Congress. The vote will be widely seen as a referendum on Trump.

WASHINGTON GUESSING GAME

The Times piece slammed Trump’s leadership style as “impetuous, adversarial, petty and ineffective” and called some of his decisions “half-baked, ill-informed and occasionally reckless.” It said some senior officials have been working from within to frustrate parts of Trump’s agenda and protect the country from his worst impulses.
Some of the guess-the-author game centered on whether the author worked in the White House or a federal agency. Language in the article, including the unusual word “lodestar,” was the subject of wide online speculation and language searches.
#NYTimesOpEd was among top-trending hashtags on Twitter.
FILE PHOTO: U.S. President Donald Trump speaks next to Vice President Mike Pence (R) during a swearing-in ceremony for U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo (L) at the State Department in Washington, U.S., May 2, 2018. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst/File Photo
White House spokeswoman Sarah Sanders tried to shut down the speculation.
“The media’s obsession with the identity of the anonymous coward is recklessly tarnishing the reputation of thousands of great Americans who proudly serve our country and work for President Trump. Stop,” she wrote on Twitter.
UN Ambassador Nikki Haley told reporters she was not the author. Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin’s spokesman Tony Sayegh said on Twitter it was “laughable to think this could come from the secretary.” Agriculture Secretary Sonny Perdue said through a spokesman that he was not the author, either.
Trump sought to portray the op-ed as a reflection of yet more anger by Democrats who have never accepted his surprise 2016 presidential election win.
He invoked the term “deep state” - used to portray people with a political agenda working against him - as well as his campaign promise to drain what he has called the corrupt Washington swamp.
“The Deep State and the Left, and their vehicle, the Fake News Media, are going Crazy - & they don’t know what to do,” he tweeted on Thursday morning.
“I’m draining the Swamp, and the Swamp is trying to fight back. Don’t worry, we will win!” he tweeted earlier.

Friday, July 20, 2018

Concern in White House over intelligence chief's Russian summit surprise

July 21, 2018  09H:32  GMT/UTC/ZULU TIME
WASHINGTON - While U.S. President Donald Trump defended his efforts to build a relationship with Russian President Vladimir Putin, aides said on Friday there is some frustration that the U.S. intelligence chief did not know about plans for a second summit and they hope that meeting will follow a more traditional pattern.
U.S. Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats and White House Social Media Director Dan Scavino (rear) listen during a cabinet meeting at the White House in Washington, U.S., July 18, 2018. REUTERS/Leah Millis
Since Monday’s summit and joint news conference in Helsinki, Trump and his aides have been trying to control the damage done when he stunned the world by siding with Putin over U.S. intelligence agencies on the question of Moscow’s meddling in the 2016 U.S. election.
The U.S. director of national intelligence Dan Coats, who on Monday immediately defended intelligence personnel on the election issue, expressed surprise at Trump’s invitation on Thursday to Putin to visit Washington in the autumn.
SPONSORED
Coats was on camera while at the Aspen Security Forum in Colorado when news broke of the invitation, clearly taking him aback. He advised against a one-on-one meeting with Putin, saying he “would look for a different way of doing it.”
If Coats had been in Washington instead of the conference, he would have been informed about the plan, one source familiar with the inner workings of the White House said on condition of anonymity.
“That DNI Coats was surprised, and his fanciful reaction, is what is most alarming to people,” the source said.
Some in Trump’s inner circle saw the Helsinki summit as problematic for the president and that he looked weak, another source close to Trump said, as he missed a chance to show strength in dealing with Putin by confronting him about the election interference.
FILE PHOTO: U.S. President Donald Trump gestures during a joint news conference with Russia's President Vladimir Putin after their meeting in Helsinki, Finland, July 16, 2018. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque/File Photo
In a CNBC interview broadcast on Friday, Trump said he and Putin had a rapport in Helsinki. U.S. intelligence agencies accuse Putin of directing interference to sway the election against Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton toward Republican Trump.
“Look, the fact is we got along well,” Trump said in the interview, which was taped on Thursday. He added that the two did not agree on everything. “It wasn’t always conciliatory in that meeting,” he said, without elaborating.
Five days after the two-hour Helsinki meeting, attended only by the two leaders and their interpreters, some U.S. officials remained in the dark about what was discussed.
On Twitter, Trump listed topics he and Putin talked about, but gave no details. He said they discussed counterterrorism, Israel’s security, nuclear proliferation, cyber attacks, trade, Ukraine, Middle East peace and North Korea.
There are hopes inside the administration that the next summit will be more traditional, with U.S. and Russian negotiators meeting ahead of time to set up an agenda and try to reach agreement on some issues.
One official, asked if the reaction to Helsinki would be a more organized process, said this is often how the White House operates. Another official said aides thought a proper procedure had been put in place for Helsinki, but it did not work out.

SYRIA, UKRAINE

As Americans groped for information about the meeting, Moscow offered snippets of its version on Friday.
MSFT.ONASDAQ
+1.87(+1.79%)
MSFT.O
  • MSFT.O
Russia’s Defense Ministry said it sent detailed proposals to Washington on organizing the return of more than 1.7 million refugees to Syria after agreements reached by Putin and Trump, RIA news agency said.
U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo told reporters at the United Nations later that Trump and Putin discussed how to return refugees who fled the civil war in Syria, but offered no details and did not mention any Russian proposals.
Russia’s Interfax news agency reported that Putin also made proposals to Trump involving eastern Ukraine, citing Russia’s ambassador to the United States, Anatoly Antonov. He did not spell out what they were.
A White House National Security Council spokesman said later the United States on Friday rejected a proposal from Russia for a referendum to decide the fate of eastern Ukraine.
The Russian ambassador said Moscow is ready to discuss a proposed new meeting between Putin and Trump, Interfax said.
Putin has rejected accusations that his government meddled in the election won by Trump. A week ago, a federal grand jury indicted 12 Russian intelligence officers for carrying out cyber attacks to undermine Democratic Party networks. A special counsel is also investigating whether Trump campaign aides coordinated with Russian officials, which Trump denies.
U.S. intelligence officials have said Moscow is targeting congressional elections in November, as well.
A Microsoft Corp (MSFT.O) executive said on Thursday at the Colorado conference that Russian hackers have targeted at least three candidates running in November. The company found evidence of a fake Microsoft site being used for phishing attacks and was able to take down the page and hackers did not get in, said Tom Burt, vice president of customer security. Burt declined to identify the candidates.

Thursday, July 19, 2018

BREAKING: Trump rejects proposal for Russia to interrogate US citizens


Media captionRussian ambassadors react to Trump remarks at Helsinki summit
by Melissa Gruz and Biodun Iginla, BBC News, Washington. Melissa Gruz traveled with the President to Europe.
US President Donald Trump has rejected a proposal made by the Russian leader Vladimir Putin that Russia be allowed to question US citizens.
The White House earlier said it would consider it but now says Mr Trump "disagrees" with the suggestion.
The offer was made at a summit of the two leaders. In return, Mr Putin suggested he might allow access to 12 Russians indicted by the US.
The idea of allowing a foreign power to quiz US citizens sparked outrage.
"It is a proposal that was made in sincerity by President Putin, but President Trump disagrees with it," White House spokeswoman Sarah Sanders said on Thursday.
"Hopefully President Putin will have the 12 identified Russians come to the United States to prove their innocence or guilt," she said.
The idea appeared to take US Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats by surprise. He was being interviewed when he was told about the tweet.
ADVERTISEMENT
Media captionDan Coats reacts to Putin visit news
"That's going to be special", he said.

What was on offer?

In what President Trump called a "tremendous" gesture, Mr Putin said he would let US prosecutors interview the 12 Russians in exchange for Russian access to US nationals the Kremlin accuses of "illegal actions".
The individuals are related to Russia's case against the financier Bill Browder, a fierce Putin critic who was instrumental in the US imposing sanctions in 2012 on top Russian officials accused of corruption.
Mr Browder told the BBC he was glad President Trump "isn't going to hand me over to President Putin".
But he added: "I'm a little amazed that this whole conversation has taken place over a three-day period when Trump should have immediately rejected it, as any other head of state would have."
Russia was also seeking to interview Michael McFaul, another Putin critic who was US ambassador to Moscow under President Obama.
Allowing Russian officials to interview Mr McFaul would be a violation of the longstanding tradition that foreign diplomats have legal immunity.
Criticism has piled up: The Senate voted 98-0 on a resolution warning President Trump not to allow Russia to question diplomats and other officials.
Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton called the idea "deeply troubling", President Obama's ex-National Security Adviser Susan Rice said it was "outrageous" while even the current Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said it was "not going to happen".

Trump prepares a sequel

By the BBC's Anthony Zurcher in Washington
Donald Trump has tweeted that the summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin was a "great success" and people at "higher ends of intelligence" loved his Helsinki news conference. As if to underline that point, plans are already under way for a sequel - this time in Washington DC.
Never mind that the White House has spent three days trying to clean up the political fallout from the summit amid bipartisan criticism, or that the special counsel investigation into Russian meddling in 2016 continues apace.
Media captionTrump says he "misspoke" at Putin summit, but is it too late? Anthony Zurcher explains
Mr Trump may have been encouraged by recent opinion polling showing that while the public at large is uneasy with Mr Trump's Russia policies, his Republican base - by a sizeable majority - is fine with his performance.
The president campaigned on closer ties with Russia, a goal that had been thwarted during his first year in office. With his base still behind him, Mr Trump appears ready to press on with his efforts.

What's happened since the Trump-Putin summit?

Following his first summit with Vladimir Putin, President Trump has been fighting accusations he failed to stand up to the Russian leader.
He clarified remarks he made at a news conference after the meeting, in which he said he saw no reason why Russia would meddle in the 2016 US election - despite US intelligence concluding just that.
Media captionTrump on Putin: "As the leader of a country, you would have to hold him responsible, yes"
Speaking to CBS News on Wednesday, Mr Trump said he held Mr Putin personally responsible for interfering in the election, and that he was "very strong on the fact that we can't have meddling".
Both men have hailed the summit. In a series of tweets Mr Trump said he was keen to meet Mr Putin again.
Mr Putin also described the summit as "successful" but warned "there are forces in the United States that are prepared to casually sacrifice Russian-US relations".

More on this story