Biodun Iginla, BBC News

Biodun Iginla, BBC News
Showing posts with label Media regulator Ofcom. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Media regulator Ofcom. Show all posts

Wednesday, February 12, 2020

ANALYSIS: Britain starts setting up 'first internet watchdog'


ADVERTISING
London 
The British government said Wednesday it plans to allow its broadcast regulator to police the internet and issue substantial fines when social media giants fail to remove "online harm".
Media minister Nicky Morgan told parliament she was "minded to" give the Office of Communications (Ofcom) the powers to oversee online user-generated content.
But she said the expanded agency -- dubbed the "first internet watchdog" by UK media -- would lack the power to take down offensive posts or block platforms that violate "their duty of care".
Those suggestions were outlined in a set of proposals published last April by the government of former prime minister Theresa May.
Prime Minister Boris Johnson took over in July and focused first on navigating the Brexit crisis.
But Britain safely left the European Union last month and his government is now preparing to stamp its own vision on the country.
Morgan and Interior Minister Priti Patel published a report outlining Ofcom's "power to issue warnings, notices and substantial fines" to companies "that facilitate the sharing of (abusive) user-generated content".
The two senior ministers stressed they were equally conscious of respecting freedoms of expression and remaining a "pro-technology government".
"We will not prevent adults from accessing or posting legal content, nor require companies to remove specific pieces of legal content," they wrote.
"The new regulatory framework will instead require companies, where relevant, to explicitly state what content and behaviour is acceptable on their sites and then for platforms to enforce this consistently."
- 'Legal but harmful' -
Ofcom was established in 2002 and began to formally oversee television and radio the following year.
But Britain has no official internet or social media regulator and is looking for ways to stop harmful online material from reaching children.
The issue gained added urgency when a British schoolgirl killed herself in 2017 after following a series of accounts about suicide and depression on Instagram and Pinterest.
"Two thirds of adults in the UK are concerned about content online, and close to half say that they have seen hateful content in the past year," Wednesday's report said.
Social media giants such as Facebook want governments to adopt a common rulebook and oversight bodies that could take the pressure off their own management teams.
"New rules are needed so that we have a more common approach across platforms and private companies aren't making so many important decisions alone," Facebook said in response to Wednesday's report.
"Any new rules need to protect people from harm without undermining freedom of expression," it added.
The big tech companies have said they also want the government to clarify how "legal content" is defined.
The Internet Association lobby, which represents companies such as Amazon and Google, said it had several "issues of concern" about Britain's plan.
These include "the scope of regulation, treatment of legal but potentially harmful content, and enforcement powers," its UK chief Daniel Dyball said.
- No executive fines -
The government has been consulting top social media managers about its proposals for over a year.
Britain's role in drafting a universal solution was boosted by Mark Zuckerberg's appointment in 2018 of former UK deputy prime minister Nick Clegg as Facebook's head of global affairs and communications.
Clegg and Zuckerberg are now setting up an oversight board at Facebook that would issue final rulings on contentious content.
The UK report said social media executives rebelled at the idea of London fining individual managers who fail to respond to the regulator's warnings.
The proposal was seen as a measure of last resort by May's media minister.
"Senior manager liability emerged as an area of concern," Wednesday's report said.
"Discussions with industry highlighted the risk of potential negative impacts on the attractiveness of the UK tech sector."
The government said it will set out its final proposals in the coming months.

Saturday, April 21, 2018

Ofcom seeks to scrap local TV roll-out


  • 21 April 2018
  •   18H:21  GMT/UTC/ZULU TIME
  • 406comments
Big Centre TVImage copyrightBIG CENTRE TV
Image captionBirmingham's Big Centre TV has been replaced
by Selina O'Grady and Biodun Iginla, BBC News Technology reporters, London
Media regulator Ofcom has proposed scrapping the further roll-out of local TV channels across the UK, citing concerns over "economic viability".
More than 30 local TV stations have already been set up in the UK as part of a plan laid out in 2011 by then culture secretary Jeremy Hunt.
But several of the channels have faced financial difficulties and have struggled to attract an audience.
Ofcom has now proposed scrapping the roll-out of further local channels.
"Requiring new infrastructure to be built for additional local TV channels is not, in our current view, economically viable. It could also undermine the many local services already on air," a spokeswoman said.

Licence obligations

Mr Hunt's vision was for major towns and cities in the UK to have their own local TV stations.
The business model is successful in the US, but local stations there are usually affiliated with a larger television network such as Fox or NBC.
In May 2012, companies were invited to apply for a licence to broadcast in major cities including Belfast, Cardiff, Glasgow and London.
That's Manchester TVImage copyrightTHAT'S MANCHESTER
Image captionThat's TV now owns several local licences
Money was taken from the TV licence fee to finance some start-up costs, including the cost of building transmission infrastructure.
Successful bidders were given a prominent channel number on digital terrestrial television (Freeview), but they were also obliged to produce a quota of local news as part of their licence agreement.
Since the first service launched in 2013:
  • several stations - including the capital's service London Live - have asked Ofcom to reduce their local news obligations
  • many of the stations have been ridiculed for the poor quality of their output or have been reported to Ofcom for breaching broadcasting rules
  • several stations have merged operations and now broadcast non-local programmes to save money
STV won the broadcast licence for several cities in Scotland including Glasgow, Aberdeen and Ayr. However, its local STV2 service is loss-making and in March the company said it was conducting a "strategic review" of its operations.
Ofcom had identified 13 further locations as local TV candidates, but said it was now minded to end the roll-out.
"Most licences for locations with a household coverage of under 50,000 have not managed to attract viable applications," it said in its statement.
It also suggested the cost of building transmission infrastructure was prohibitive, since the BBC was no longer required to fund it.
Ofcom has invited companies to respond to its proposals.

Related Topics

More on this story