Biodun Iginla, BBC News

Biodun Iginla, BBC News
Showing posts with label search engines. Show all posts
Showing posts with label search engines. Show all posts

Friday, July 13, 2018

Fake news: algorithms in the dock


by Tamara Kachelmeier and Biodun Iginla, France24 Technology reporters, SAN FRANCISCO


    © AFP/File | Algorithms run our Google searches, our Facebook newsfeed, recommend articles or videos to us and sometimes censor questionable content

    SAN FRANCISCO - 
    At the heart of the spread of fake news are the algorithms used by search engines, websites and social media which are often accused of pushing false or manipulated information regardless of the consequences.
    - What are algorithms? -
    They are the invisible but essential computer programmes and formulas that increasingly run modern life, designed to repeatedly solve recurrent problems or to make decisions on their own.
    Their ability to filter and seek out links in gigantic databases means it would be impossible to run global markets without them, but they can also be refined down to produce personalised quotes on everything from mortgages to plane tickets.
    They also run our Google searches, our Facebook newsfeed, recommend articles or videos to us and sometimes censor questionable content because it may contain violence, pornography or racist language.
    Other algorithms charged with the most complex and sensitive tasks can be opaque "black boxes" which develop their own artificial intelligence based on our data.
    - A skewed view of the world? -
    "Algorithms can help us find our way through the huge amount of information on the internet," said Margrethe Vestager, the European commissioner for competition.
    "But the problem is that we only see what these algorithms -- and the companies that use them -- choose to show us," she added.
    In organising your online content, algorithms also tend to create "filter bubbles", insulating us from opposing points of view.
    During the US presidential election in 2016, Facebook was accused of helping Donald Trump by allowing often false information about his rival Hillary Clinton to circulate online, closing people into a news bubble.
    Algorithms also tend to make extreme opinions "and fringe views more visible than ever", according to Berlin-based Lorena Jaume-Palasi, founder of the Algorithm Watch group.
    However, their effects can be difficult to measure, she warned, saying that algorithms alone are not to blame for the rise in nationalism in Europe.
    - Spreading fake news? -
    Social media algorithms tend to push the most viewed content without checking if it is true or not, which is why they magnify the impact of fake news.
    On YouTube in particular, conspiracy theory videos get a great deal more traffic than accurate and properly sourced ones, said Guillaume Chaslot, one of the Google-owned platform's former engineers.
    These videos, which may claim that the moon landings or climate change are lies, get far more views and comments, keeping users on the platform longer and undermining credible, traditional media, Chaslot insisted.
    - More ethical algorithms? -
    Some observers believe that algorithms could be programmed "to serve human freedom", with many non-governmental groups demanding far more transparency.
    "Coca-Cola doesn't reveal its formula but its products are tested for their effect on our health," Jaume-Palasi argued, insisting on the need for clear regulation.
    The French privacy protection body, the CNIL, last year recommended state oversight of algorithms and that there should be a real push to educate people "so they understand the cogs of the (information technology) machine".
    New European data protection rules also allow people to contest the decision of an algorithm and "demand a human intervention" in case of conflict.
    Some internet giants have themselves begun to act to some degree: Facebook has started an effort to automatically label suspicious posts, while YouTube is reinforcing its "human controls" on videos aimed at children.
    However, former Silicon Valley insiders who make up the Center for Humane Technology, which was set up to combat tech's excesses, have warned that "we can't expect attention-extraction companies like YouTube, Facebook, Snapchat, or Twitter to change, because it's against their business model."

    Saturday, October 11, 2014

    Thousands of Britons seek 'right to be forgotten'


    by Emily Straton, Tamara Kachelmeier, and Biodun Iginla, BBC News Analysts

    Google logo

    Related Stories

    One in 10 requests for web links to be removed from search results under European "right to be forgotten" laws have come from the UK, Google has said.
    Google said it had removed 498,737 links from search results since May this year - including 63,616 pages following requests from the UK.
    It said 18,304 requests were made in the UK, the third highest in the EU.
    It follows a European Court of Justice ruling that links to irrelevant and outdated data can be erased on request.
    The ruling sparked criticisms over censorship of material.
    According to data released on its website, Google removed 35% - or 18,459 - of unwanted links to web pages following requests from the UK.
    Grey line
    A right to be forgotten?
    European Court of Justice, Luxembourg
    • In 2012, the European Commission published plans for a "right to be forgotten" law, allowing people to request that data about themselves to be deleted
    • Online service providers would have to comply unless they had "legitimate" reason to do otherwise
    • The plans are part of a wide-ranging overhaul of the commission's 1995 Data Protection Directive
    • UK's Ministry of Justice claims that the law "raises unrealistic and unfair expectations"
    • Some tech firms have expressed concern about the reach of the bill
    'Embarrassing content' As part of a transparency report, Google also provided examples of the sorts of requests it had received, along with the search engine's decision.
    It said it had turned down requests from a UK public official who wanted a link to a student organisation's petition demanding his removal taken down.
    Google also rejected the request of a former clergyman from the UK who asked for two links to articles about an investigation into sexual abuse accusations about him to be removed.
    It said a UK "media professional" had requested the removal of four links to articles reporting on "embarrassing content he posted to the internet", a request the search engine also turned down.
    A doctor had requested more than 50 links to newspaper articles about a botched procedure be removed, it said.
    Google said "three pages that contained personal information about the doctor but did not mention the procedure have been removed from search results for his name", but "the rest of the links to reports on the incident remain in search results".
    It said a news summary of a man who was convicted at a magistrates' court had been removed as, under the UK Rehabilitation of Offenders Act, his conviction had been spent.
    Facebook was the site most impacted , with 3,353 links removed across Europe, while YouTube was second, with 2,392 URLs deleted.

    More on This Story

    Related Stories