Biodun Iginla, BBC News

Biodun Iginla, BBC News

Thursday, August 29, 2019

ANALYSIS: The Dreyfus affair: the story behind Polanski's film


ADVERTISING
Paris 
The Dreyfus affair, subject of the new Roman Polanski film which is premiering at the Venice Film Festival, triggered a national crisis over anti-Semitism in France in the late 19th century.
Here is an account of the scandal, which had wide international repercussions.
- Accused -
ADVERTISING
Alfred Dreyfus was a 36-year-old Jewish French army captain, from the Alsace region of eastern France which was at the time occupied by Germany.
He was accused in October 1894 of passing secret information on new artillery equipment to the German military attache.
The accusation was based on a comparison of handwriting on a document found in the German's waste paper basket in Paris.
- On trial -
Dreyfus was put on trial, against the background of a virulent anti-Semitic press campaign.
His family tried in vain to defend him and he protested his innocence.
Despite the lack of evidence, he was convicted of treason on December 22, 1894, and sentenced to life imprisonment at the infamous Devil's Island penal colony in French Guiana and publicly stripped of his rank.
The scandal rocked the assumption that Jews had become an integral part of French life -- revealing the depths of anti-Jewish sentiment in the country.
- Secret investigation -
Lieutenant Colonel Georges Picquart, head of the intelligence services, reinvestigated the case in secret.
In 1896 he discovered that the handwriting on the incriminating message was that of another officer, Ferdinand Walsin Esterhazy.
When he presented the evidence to the general staff of the French army they refused to admit there had been a mistake.
Esterhazy was court-martialled and acquitted after a farce of a trial in 1898, moving to England.
Picquart was driven out of the army and jailed for a year. Rehabilitated, he was later made war minister from 1906-1909.
- 'J'accuse' -
On January 13, 1898, the famous French novelist Emile Zola published his famous "J'accuse" open letter to the president of the day.
He named officials who had framed Dreyfus and lambasted the French government for its anti-Semitism.
Such was the official backlash that the author of "Germinal" had to flee into exile in England for about 10 months after being convicted of libel.
France was divided between liberal and left-wing supporters of Dreyfus and opponents on the Catholic right -- many of whom made no secret of their anti-Semitism. There were frequent riots.
- Exonerated -
In June 1899, Dreyfus was brought back to France for a second trial. He was initially found guilty and sentenced to 10 years in prison, before being officially pardoned -- though not cleared of the charges.
On July 12, 1906, after many twists, the high court of appeal overturned the original verdict, exonerating Dreyfus.
He was reinstated with the rank of major. He served during World War I and died in 1935, aged 76, to general indifference.
- Dreyfus and Herzl -
The young Hungarian Jewish journalist Theodor Herzl, a Paris correspondent for an Austrian newspaper, closely followed the Dreyfus affair, and was disgusted by the anti-Semitism it revealed.
The man who became regarded as the "Father of Zionism", later said that the Dreyfus affair had motivated his belief that Jews should move out of Europe and set up their own state instead.

Wednesday, August 28, 2019

BREAKING: Democratic Senator Kirsten Gillibrand drops out of the presidential race


Johannes Eisele, AFP | In this file photo taken on March 24, 2019 Democratic presidential candidate Kristen Gillibrand speaks during the official kick-off rally of her campaign for US president in New York.
Democrat Kirsten Gillibrand dropped out of the presidential race Wednesday, abruptly ending a campaign that once looked poised to ride strong #MeToo credentials to formidability but instead collapsed amid low polling and fundraising struggles.
ADVERTISING
"I know this isn't the result that we wanted," the 52-year-old New Yorksenator said in an online video in which she didn't endorse any other 2020 Democratic White House hopeful. "But it's important to know when it's not your time."
The decision came as Gillibrand failed to qualify for a debate coming next month in Houston by not hitting 2% in at least four approved public opinion polls while securing 130,000 unique donors   despite spending millions on online and TV ads to woo people contributing as little as $1.
That proved especially embarrassing since candidates who began the race with far lower national profiles, including businessman Andrew Yang, made it.
On the eve of Wednesday's qualifying deadline, Gillibrand met with her family and decided that if a pair of polls set to be released the following morning didn't help her meet the polling threshold, she'd drop out.
Both ultimately showed her at 0%.
To get to the U.S. House, Gillibrand had topped an incumbent Republican in a conservative part of upstate New York in 2007, and she was appointed to the Senate two years later, filling the seat vacated by Hillary Clinton. She later retained the seat during a 2010 special election, as well as in 2012 and 2018.
Vocal in the Senate on curbing sexual harassment and military sexual assault, as well as promoting equal pay for women and family leave, Gillibrand made those and her staunch defense of abortion rights the core of her presidential bid.
She stood out in the crowded Democratic presidential field by becoming the first to declare she'd only appoint judges to the Supreme Court who consider the landmark 1973 Roe v. Wade decision legalising abortion nationwide settled law, though most of her competitors quickly followed suit.
Gillibrand also used her run to highlight systemic racism and white privilege, speaking on the subject frequently on issues such as mass incarceration, urban gun violence and maternal mortality rates for black women.
She initially hoped to stay in the race in a bid to qualify for October's debates, but her financial situation made that impossible. Gillibrand finishes with just $800,000 left in her campaign bank account. That means she spent well over $7 million, just since June 30.
A campaign aide said Wednesday that getting media coverage that could help boost Gillibrand's polling and fundraising had become too difficult. Gillibrand met with staff at her campaign headquarters in Troy, New York, on Wednesday afternoon to tell them it was over.
After forming an exploratory committee in January and formally entering the race by calling President Donald Trump a "coward" in a March speech delivered near the New York City skyscraper bearing his name, Gillibrand began with $10.5-plus million left over from her 2018 Senate campaign in her presidential campaign coffers.
That seemed like more than enough for the long haul. But Gillibrand was the first Senate Democrat in December 2017 to call for Minnesota Sen.
Al Franken's resignation amid numerous allegations of sexual misconduct, and she has said for months that that alienated donors and some voters in neighboring Iowa, which kicks off presidential primary voting with its caucuses Feb. 3.
Many of her Senate colleagues seeking the Democratic presidential nomination   including Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts, Cory Booker of New Jersey, Kamala Harris of California and Bernie Sanders of Vermont   followed her lead in calling for Franken to step down before he quit in January 2018. But Gillibrand has faced the most questions about being too quick to condemn him.
Gillibrand said in July that she didn't regret urging Franken's resignation but argued that female senators were being blamed more than their male colleagues for a decision that Franken himself ultimately made.
"Women are asked to hold accountable their colleagues. The men are not," Gillibrand said. "It's outrageous. It's absurd."
Harris tweeted moments after Gillibrand's announcement that the New Yorker "is a brave voice on some of the most critical issues facing our country today   from childcare to sexual assault.
She is a champion and I know she's not done fighting for women and families everywhere." Trump offered a tweet scoffing at Gillibrand's low polling.
A record 100-plus women were elected to Congress in 2018, and Gillibrand's championing of the #MeToo movement under the slogan "Brave Wins" had seemed to provide a clear lane for 2020 success.
Gillibrand touted being the nation's first woman to seek the White House with young children, and the graduate of Dartmouth and UCLA law school looked on paper to initially have the strongest of 2020 resumes   making her fall from early favourite to also-ran all the more surprising.
During a Fox News town hall in June, Gillibrand said, "We want women to have a seat at the table," and when moderator Chris Wallace responded, "What about men?" Gillibrand shot back with one of the most memorable lines of her campaign: "They're already there   do you not know?"
As she continued to struggle for traction, though, questions about why Gillibrand was still running intensified. Asked in July if she hoped to be another candidate's choice for vice president, Gillibrand wouldn't rule it out.
"I'm running for president of the United States because I believe that I am the best leader to take this country forward," she told The Associated Press in an interview during a bus tour in Michigan. "But I will always serve in all capacities because I am here to serve others."
The crowded Democratic presidential field of more than two dozen candidates had already begun to winnow before Gillibrand's announcement.
U.S. Rep. Eric Swalwell of California left the 2020 race in July, followed by former Colorado Gov. John Hickenlooper, Washington Gov. Jay Inslee and U.S. Rep. Seth Moulton of Massachusetts earlier this month.