Biodun Iginla, BBC News

Biodun Iginla, BBC News
Showing posts with label Muslim. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Muslim. Show all posts

Friday, July 19, 2019

ANALYSIS: Ex-jihadist Tania Joya now fights to 'reprogram' extremists



British-born former jihadist Tania Joya is in Washington as part of a program to prevent violent extremism
British-born former jihadist Tania Joya is in Washington as part of a program to prevent violent extremism AFP
ADVERTISING
Washington 
Tania Joya has devoted her life to "reprogramming" extremists and reintroducing them into society -- a process she understands well as a "former Islamic jihadist" herself.
"My aim is for them to feel a sense of remorse and to train them so that they can be good citizens once they are released from prison, so they can adjust to society," Joya said during a visit to Washington, to present a project on preventing extremist violence.
Born in 1984 near London to a Muslim Bangladeshi family, Joya grew up confronted by racism and the struggles of integration. She radicalized at age 17, after the September 11 terror attacks in New York and Osama bin Laden's call for a global jihad.
In 2004, she married an American Muslim-convert, Yahya al-Bahrumi (born John Georgelas). She began advocating for an Islamic state, for which her three children would be soldiers.
But in 2013, her husband took her and their children against her will to northwestern Syria to join jihadist insurgents. Joya reported her husband to US authorities and, after three weeks, fled Syria to the United States.
Joya settled in Texas, her husband's home state. There, she rejected Islam and changed her life, divorced and re-married.
- Re-programming, giving them hope -
Yahya, her first husband, joined the Islamic State group, which would soon control large swathes of territory in Syria and Iraq. He was in charge of the group's English-language propaganda, and Joya said he became the "highest-ranking American" in the IS group.
He died in 2017 during fighting in Mayadin, in northern Syria, as the so-called IS "caliphate" crumbled.
However this created a new problem -- Western jihadists or their spouses and children wanting to come home.
Joya realized that she had something to offer. "It's really important to de-radicalize them, rehabilitate" these people, she said.
"It's reprogramming them and giving them a sense of hope in the political process."
It's also important to "get them to understand the psychology and the patterns... what led them to extremism," understanding "the rejection many in the US and Europe faced growing up there, the cultural conflict, the crisis they went through," she said.
"Once it's all explained to them, very logically, they will accept it just as I did."
Joya favors repatriating foreign rebels from the Middle East so they can be judged in their countries of origin.
While that is the US policy, many European countries such as France are wary of taking in the jihadists.
In May and June, 11 French nationals were sentenced to die in Iraq for their affiliation to IS.
Joya has campaigned for the return of Shamima Begum, who joined the jihadist group when she was just 15 but now wants to return home to Britain. However Begum's lack of remorse has turned public opinion against her, and the British government stripped her of her citizenship in February.
Kurdish-run camps in northeast Syria have taken in some 12,000 foreign fighters from 40 different countries, including 4,000 women and 8,000 children whose fathers are jihadists.
- 'Inoculation' against indoctrination -
Countries with jihadists stranded in refugee camps "are responsible for these individuals," said Joya. "We can't just push them off to the Middle East, to the Kurdish people... the abuses they're facing in these camps are only confirming their beliefs of radicalization."
Joya is participating in the Preventing Violent Extremism (PVE) program organized by the Clarion Program, a US non-profit dedicated to educating people "about the growing phenomenon of Islamic extremism," according to its website.
The PVE program provides "communication models" that offer "workshops for youth so that before a child is even indoctrinated or introduced to radical ideologies, they've really been inoculated" against religious and ideological extremism, said national program coordinator Shireen Qudosi.
"That goes from gangs, to radical ideologies: antifa, neo-Nazi groups, Islamist extremism," she said.

Tuesday, March 14, 2017

Headscarves: Defining discrimination--an analysis

by Isabelle Roussel and Biodun Iginla, Political Analysts, The Economist Intelligence Unit, Luxembourg

Employers may sometimes ban staff from wearing headscarves

The European Court of Justice rules that a ban is not discriminatory if it meets certain conditions
EMPLOYERS are entitled to forbid their Muslim staff from wearing headscarves as long as it is part of a consistent practice of banning the display of religious or ideological symbols, and not a one-off action aimed at satisfying the demands of a particular client.
That was the main thrust of a decision issued today by the European Court of Justice (ECJ), a Luxembourg-based tribunal whose job it is to interpret and uphold the laws of the European Union. “An internal rule…which prohibits the visible wearing of any political, philosophical or religious sign does not constitute direct discrimination,” the court said.      

Latest updates

See all updates
The ECJ judges were looking into the cases of a Belgian woman who was fired from her job as a receptionist at a security company after she started wearing a headscarf, and of a French IT consultant who was told to remove her scarf after a client complained, and then dismissed when she declined.
In both cases, the ECJ suggested that national courts needed to investigate further to establish whether the women had been discriminated against. In the Belgian case, the court recommended working out if there might have been a simpler solution such as transferring the employee to a role where she was not in contact with the public. Regarding the French consultant, it considered it necessary to establish whether the disciplinary action was purely a response to the client’s whim (which appeared to be the case and would be insufficient grounds for a dismissal) or a legitimate consequence of a broader policy. Taken as a whole, today’s decision upheld the right of employers to enforce ideological neutrality in the workplace as long as it was done fairly and consistently.
This marks a contrast with the thinking of America’s Supreme Court, which in 2015 vindicated a Muslim woman who had been turned down for a job by the clothing chain Abercrombie and Fitch on the grounds that her headscarf was out of step with the look the company was promoting. Since 1964, American civil-rights legislation has told employers to provide “reasonable accommodation” of their workers’ religious needs, unless it would be unbearably burdensome to do so. Today's decision also reflected a more secularist spirit than did one by the European Court of Human Rights in 2013, which upheld the right of a Christian woman to wear a discreet cross with her British Airways uniform.  
Today’s judgement might look like a careful, Solomonic piece of jurisprudence designed to take the sting out of a contentious issue by steering a course down the middle. But so charged is the political atmosphere in Europe these days that it is likely to have the very opposite effect.
The decision was instantly deplored by Islamic and some other religious groups, as well as some secular human-rights campaigners including Amnesty International, for legitimising discrimination. No less speedily, it was welcomed by some of the resurgent forces on Europe’s cultural and political right, including Germany’s anti-immigrant "Alternative for Germany" party.
The ruling does indeed appear to be good news for Marine Le Pen, the French presidential candidate who would like to see all conspicuous religious symbols removed from public spaces. It should also please the right-wing standard-bearer in this week’s Dutch elections, Geert Wilders, who has listed the headscarf as one of the many manifestations of Islam that he would like to see much less of. Francois Fillon, the centre-right (and culturally conservative) candidate in the French presidential race, was among the first public figures to welcome the ruling.
A more liberal-minded and middle-of-the-road defence of the decision came from Britain's National Secular Society, whose campaigns director Stephen Evans said that for bosses, "religous and political neutrality is a perfectly reasonable aim." Meanwhile intense Muslim unhappiness over the ruling was articulated by the Islamic Human Rights Commission, a London-based lobby group, where a spokeswoman said: “This gives legal cover to what is essentially an ongoing hate campaign to make Muslims second-class citizens in Europe. It will only increase feelings of marginalisation and disenfranchisement in Muslim communities.”
The ECJ's ruling is a call to apply a single, transparent rule to people of all creeds and cultures. But religious and cultural symbols seem to be an area where nobody can agree on what "neutrality" really means. 
View comments
Reuse this content